🔗 Share this article

Families of people buried in resting places at risk from shoreline retreat say that a lack of decision over how to tackle the issue is causing them avoidable anguish concerning the final resting places of their loved ones.

A Looming Threat to Ancient Churchyards

The council have singled out three church graveyards in the villages of Happisburgh, Trimingham, and Mundesley as being at risk of being consumed by the ocean in the coming decades.

A recent report on the situation sets out a range of possible actions, from taking no action to disinterring bodies and reburying them in more secure locations. Authorities maintain it is for local people to determine how to proceed.

“Right now we’re in a state of uncertainty. It upsets me. They intended this to be their final resting place, but it won't be because of the encroaching sea.”

Projections indicate at least a portion of one graveyard could fall into the sea in the next 80 years, but some locals worry it will happen much sooner. “I think it’s got less than 20 years, if you consider what’s occurred in the last 30 years,” a farmer stated.

Troubled by the Ghosts of Eccles

One resident remembered a childhood visit to the neighbouring settlement of Eccles, which has largely disappeared into the sea, along with its church and graveyard.

“You could see people’s bones,” she said. “Certain people hold this romantic idea that the deceased will just get washed out to sea. That is not the case. People will take bones as mementos and go plundering graves looking for treasures. That is completely undignified.”

“I’m worried that the same thing that happened at Eccles will happen here and there’ll be bones on the shore. I would feel disgusted by that.”

A Paratrooper's Grave in Jeopardy

Further up the coast is situated the grave of a former paratrooper killed while serving abroad. His parent said she could not sleep after discovering her child's grave might one day be relocated.

“It does trouble me to consider this may not remain his permanent resting place,” she said. “To our family it’s an significant place to go.”

She believes, new burials should cease but says it is premature to disturb current plots. “What I would choose for now is to take no action and closely monitor, but an early decision needs to be made when a critical moment has been reached.”

Searching for Answers and Certainty

The lack of consensus over when and how to tackle the challenge has left grieving relatives feeling frustrated and worried.

Several families want more coastal protections to delay the unavoidable loss and to allow burials to proceed for now. Different voices contend the moment for moving graves is approaching.

“The situation is very emotional,” said one relative. “The council’s report was thorough, but now there’s uncertainty about how it is taken forward. And all parties is washing their hands over who is responsible.”

A coastal manager confirmed the graveyards were under the care of the local diocese. “In the end it is up to them to decide the direction to take. We are here to assist them through that process with residents.”

He added there was time to weigh all the options. “We are talking decades before it starts to be lost.”

“Currently, there exists no common view on what should be done yet. We need productive local conversations to find the appropriate solutions for each village.”

The possibility of the loss of the historic sites was labeled one of “immense sadness for the area,” but faith leaders also spoke of a belief in resurrection, providing a theological perspective on the temporal disappearance of sacred ground.